english - keine Übersetzung - nessuna traduzzione - pas de traduction


Home
Costume Guide
Gallery
Pentecost 2002
Gruyères 2002
Pentecost 2003
Online-Dragons
Artisans
Ordinances
Mailinglists
ML Archive
Links
About


Company of St. George
Living-History Mailinglist Archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bow


From: Jonathan Davies
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:12:19 +0100

Bow bags protect against surface damage which could jeopardise a bow, ash,
elm and yew bows do not like being thrown around.  I have owned all
three and shoot a war bow and treating them like an old chair leg would
horrify me! Bow bags also help protect them from direct sunlight.  You
shouldn't leave a bow out in the sun on a hot day without being aware of the
potential consequences.  A bows performance is compromised by both heat and
cold as I know only too well having broken a 70lb bow on a cold day through
carelessness.  Bows need protection from the elements and it is natural for
any archer to protect his 'valuable' equipment.  Whether the strings need
protection from rain is another question, we still wait on the Mary Rose
excavations for some definitive information on the subject.  How they
protected the surface of the bow is another question entirely.
Cheers
Jonathan



On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Christian Folini <
christian.folini-at-time-machine.ch> wrote:

> On Tue, March 30, 2010 10:00 am, Jonathan Davies wrote:
> > Purely on a practical level you
> > would be extremely foolish to risk damaging your bow by leaving it
> > uncovered
> > when not in use.  If I do that should I assume that my illustrious
> > brethren
> > cared for ther bows less?  If they did not protect their bows then why
> > not?
>
> There have to be sources somewhere.
>
> With the hundreds of thousands of bows being in use during the 14th and
> 15th century, I do not believe in the total absence of any evidence.
>
> Either there has to be an explanation in the sources on why they do not
> need such protection. Or there has to be a hint on the form of protection
> that was being used.
>
> Hardly any bows survived, so I would not count on the survival of the
> protection (bags?). Even more so if they were made from linnen.
>
> On a painting or illumination that protection could look silly and
> uncomprohensible to an outsider. So I would not count on a period
> illustration either.
>
> So if there is anything, then it is more likely to be in the text sources.
> But of course, those are the ones, that are more difficult to access.
>
>
> I never quite understood the kind of protection a linnen bag could offer
> to a war bow. A linnen bag protects against minor scratchings on the
> surface. Anything else will destroy the bow either with or without the
> linnen bag.
> Also, water should not be an issue. Greasing the wood regularly is far
> more effective.
>
> Best,
>
> Christian
>
>
>




  • Previous by thread: Re: Bow
  • Next by thread: Re: Bow
  • Date Index
  • Thread Index



  • je lay emprins

    The texts and the pictures of this site are © by the Company of St. George.
    This site was made with the help of 'vi', perl, the Gimp, Paint shop pro and runs on a server sponsored by Jonathan Apfelkern. For further info please contact webmaster@companie-of-st-george.ch. This page was last updated 6-DEC-2003.
    Number of visitors on this page: