Home
Costume Guide
Gallery
Pentecost 2002
Gruyères 2002
Pentecost 2003
Online-Dragons
Artisans
Ordinances
Mailinglists
ML Archive
Links
About
|

|
|

|
Company of St. George Living-History Mailinglist Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
AW: PC 04, I agree with Christian :-)
From:
"Martin Jungnickel"
Date:
Tue, 15 Jun 2004 09:02:03 +0200
Hi,
I agree with most what has been said, but do keep in mind,
the original purpose of the event was to get as many 15th century groups
together on neutral ground to exchange ideas and to raise the general
standard. So the only halfway beleiveable scenario was the impirale levy
for Neuss to get together, but not to underline military is the only
thing that is worth reenacting in the 15th century. Putting the lean on
the military side will push away several groups that are more on the
civilian bit, not everyone is keen on military. Or did I miss something
that this is the wished policy?
Best wishes,
Martin
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: living-history-bounce-at-companie-of-st-george.ch
[mailto:living-history-bounce-at-companie-of-st-george.ch] Im Auftrag von
Mathieu Harlaut
Gesendet: Montag, 14. Juni 2004 16:15
An: living-history-at-companie-of-st-george.ch
Betreff: PC 04, I agree with Christian :-)
Hello,
I agree with most of what Christian said in his report on Pentecost.
The event was really fun, Thank you Dietrich and the other organisers!!!
The camp was great. Lutz made a wonderful job. It was really awesome,
the previous camp were quite good but this year it was really
convincing, and believable. The camp was no only good looking but it
was also well organised. The gate was cool!!!
Since the first event the overall look impression improved a lot, I
haven't seen so much people with unfitting garment. During mass for
example, everyone was well dressed.
As Christian pointed out there still too much modern things around the
camp. And everyone is responsible of this. There are still too much
camera (even in our ranks) and I agree with Christian there should be
only one official photographer. We cannot avoid that, otherwise we
cannot expect to convince everyone not to hang around with a camera. It
will be hard to improve on this point, it is possible but there must be
an agreement of all the participating groups to reach a even better
level of authenticity.
If the camp improved a lot in quality and organisation, I think that
the military aspect didn't improved so much.
The dizaine system worked a lot better. It was quicker to muster and
more efficient during the manoeuvres. The manoeuvres of the halberd
block was very beautiful to look at, but still a bit slow. The musters
of the all camp were still much to slow to be convincing, I think we
waited about 10 to 15 minutes before everyone was there. And I am not
talking about the muster of men with arms and armour.
It is also true that the second day was a lot better than the day
before. But we have been doing this for 3 years and it didn't worked
much better than the first time even if the manoeuvres are a bit more
sophisticated. There should be more training and different scenarios
(open field, patrol in the forest and nearby area, defence of the guns
in the field, attack, skirmish, defence of the camp, training of the
women, manoeuvres in reduced space ...) , different way to deploy the
troop (2 ranks, 5, 10, small units with each gun, splitting the unit in
order to attack one target from different directions or to attack
multiple targets...)
The skirmish on Sunday was fun and the small rubber caltrops were a
very good idea, however it was totally unrealistic. The whole Imperial
unit should have been slaughtered and meat for the crow before
reaching the top of the hill: too slow, too clumsy, and a tactic a bit
straightforward... It is not a very good example of successful assault
on 1 gun and 20 men with 2 gun and 150 men and somehow there is some
kind of ridiculous aspect to it. I think we can keep the fun of the
skirmish by making it a training, it will more believable and be less
ridiculous.
As Christian says, there is still much we can explore in the concept.
In conclusion I would say that it was great fun and the original goal
of the event has been reach more or less: a good number of people and
groups, a fair level of authenticity, (we have to look for details
before finding unhistorical items , excepting glasses and camera), most
of the participants know the drill, a believable camp with a good
organisation. Now it is time for the event to evolve, the military side
must change to be each time as exciting as the first.
Cheers,
Mathieu
Previous by thread:
Re: PC 04, I agree with Christian :-)
Next by thread:
Re: AW: PC 04, I agree with Christian :-)
Date Index
Thread Index

|