english - keine Übersetzung - nessuna traduzzione - pas de traduction


Home
Costume Guide
Gallery
Pentecost 2002
Gruyères 2002
Pentecost 2003
Online-Dragons
Artisans
Ordinances
Mailinglists
ML Archive
Links
About


Company of St. George
Living-History Mailinglist Archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Marching in formations for attack and defence


From: Henry Landis
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 22:36:50 +0100 (BST)

I have an unsubstantiated conjecture about medival Swiss pike and halbard blocks.

It seems to me that a linear formation such as used in later periods (Napoleonic) is not what was done in the 15th C. My thoughts run as follows.

At Grandson musters were collected from all the vilages surrounding say Zurich.

Each village had persons who were equipped with a variety of weapons and armour, depending on relative wealth. These people marched in column as illustrated in many contemporary illustrations. Schilling. As is well known, the fastest way of moving troops is in column. The troops from individual villages all know each other and have probably trained together. They are neighbours and look after each others backs.

As columns come together the columns merge together to form wider columns from a canton. Different cantons troops (in columns) join together to form the pike block. They may be marching on different roads to get to the battle field.

The chaps with the best armour form the front ranks of the columns, the less well armoured form third and fourth ranks etc. Troops with halbards and flambards form the colour guards in the block and are able to take advantage of any breaches in the enemy formation by passing between the columns without breaking the structure of the block. Likewise, you can have crossbows inbetween the columns who can get towards the front of the battle line to shoot and then retire to reload. Wounded men can likewise go out of the back of the block without too many problems.

If the block comes to an obstacle like a bush, tree or vineyard, it will naturally split where columns are marching next to each other. The effect of the block only relies on the front rank of each column keeping in line with the neighboring columns.

Some of my evidence for this is in the description of cannon shots at Grandson hitting the main pike block and killing umteen men from the same village. Also from the description of the forhut attacking followed by the gewalthaufen. It would appear that sometimes these formations marched out of camp, formed up and attacked very quickly, which would also tend to support my conjecture. In effect, we are talking about loads of men who know each other well playing follow the leader with a common aim and common tactics.

Let me know what you think or if anyone has any evidence that may support or refute my conjecture.

Henry

 



Yahoo! Plus - For a better Internet experience

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

  • Previous by thread: AW: Arrows
  • Next by thread: Re: Marching in formations for attack and defence
  • Date Index
  • Thread Index



  • je lay emprins

    The texts and the pictures of this site are © by the Company of St. George.
    This site was made with the help of 'vi', perl, the Gimp, Paint shop pro and runs on a server sponsored by Jonathan Apfelkern. For further info please contact webmaster@companie-of-st-george.ch. This page was last updated 6-DEC-2003.
    Number of visitors on this page: